RIT SG Professor Evaluations ca. 2005

Professors by Name | Professors by Rating | Professors by Department

Ratings for Bruce Meader

RatingQuarterComment
9920023
8120023Typography for New Media - To start of good, he knows what he is talking about and generally gets his ideas accross pretty good, problem is, it takes him 2 hours to say something i could say in 2 minutes, so he is very boring and often times tells the student more of what he wants the project to look like, rather than what the student made. Takes points off for what he doesn't like in the design. As a plus though he lets you redo all of the projects for a better grade and is very fair if you put some effort into the work.
9520023I learned a tremendous amount in my typography class, and he was always willing to discuss our work on a 1 to 1 basis. However, he could have been more enthusiastic in explaining the material.
9520023
7520011Ah, Meader is tended to "traditional" way, I never receive any C grade from my graphic design about computer. He should learn how to summary his complex details as simple. And should know how to speak and stop in right time.
I would try to avoid his any class because he is so boring to students.
7120003Although this teacher is very knowledgable in the details of graphic design, he has a habit of not seeing the forest for the trees. This makes it very difficult for students to get the information that they need to improve projects. This teacher also tends to play favorites, and is not very objective in his view of good design.
7120002I feel that he needs to learn communication skills and manners. He shoud also be pleasant to his students.
7520002He needs to be more aware of his students and what they are doing.